If you’re using a Windows 10 laptop at anything other than the default scaling factor for your display, you may encounter an issue where closing the lid causes your window positions and sizes to be forgotten. I discovered this on my MacBook Pro Retina, which I run at 100% scaling (the default is 200%). This may also apply on Windows 8.1, but I haven’t tried it on this hardware. Continue reading “Windows 10 DPI scaling and window positioning issues on laptops”
The other day, I saw that Bard’s Tale for Android had an Apple IIGS emulator hiding in it. Given that the game was $2.99, and I have an HP TouchPad running Android handy, I decided to grab it, just to see what was going on with the emulator.
Here’s my initial analysis, in the form of a YouTube video (sorry for the poor quality):
So, now that I had identified what the emulator actually was, I decided to go for a deeper look. Continue reading “Bard’s Tale for Android IIGS emulator analysis… and then some”
The release of Apple’s new MacBook Pro with Retina Display, and the discussion regarding its proprietary, difficult to expand nature (as found by iFixit when they tore down the MBPR), has triggered some thoughts on where personal computing is headed. Continue reading “Where personal computing is headed in the next 10 years”
So, I’ll admit that I didn’t quite read everything to do with this particular case.
Apple was not claiming the functionality of FutureTap’s application, but rather using it as an example UI.
While it’s still evil to do that much in my opinion, Apple isn’t trying to patent a third-party app.
I’m going to leave the previous post up, but with it made very clear that that post is in error.
I’ve been saying Apple is evil for quite a while now, but this isn’t just evil. This is kicking puppies (TV Tropes warning) evil. Even if you apply Hanlon’s Razor, in my opinion, incompetence doesn’t adequately explain this, although that’s running rampant here, too. Apple has filed a few patent applications for mobile applications as of late, and for one of those applications, application number 20100190510, Systems and Methods for Accessing Travel Services Using a Portable Electronic Device, they decided to shamelessly rip off a third party developer’s iPhone app, “Where To?” And, no, they didn’t get permission from the developers. What the fuck, Apple? What the fuck? Now, let’s say that FutureTap fights this in court. Let’s say that they can even win against Apple’s legal budget. Now, their business model is based on selling iPhone apps. We already know that Apple’s app approval process is extremely arbitrary. A win against Apple likely guarantees that their apps will get permanently banned from the App Store, killing their business. With this, Apple’s sending a very, very clear message to developers: Develop for the iPhone, and you work for us, not for yourself. Source: GigaOm
UPDATE: I’m retracting this post, as I see that I’m in error. I’m leaving it posted, but please see this post.
You’ve probably heard of People of Wal-Mart, a site showcasing the, uh, dregs of society that can be found shopping at Wal-Mart. (If you haven’t, it’s quite entertaining. No, I’m not affiliated with them in any way.)
An iPhone app, Funny Shoppers, was developed for the site that allowed users to view images from the site within an app, and submit their photos from the app. However, Apple rejected the app, citing obscene content – something that they’ve used many times in the past to ban apps that they don’t like.
So, the developers, Alkali Media, decided to remove photos of any people from the app. Yep, still offensive…
Yet, Apple later approved an app, Shopper Fail, which used the same content! Apple wouldn’t comment on it, and it took a cease and desist to stop the second app from being distributed.
Apple eventually suggests that Alkali Media remove all references to Wal-Mart from the app. Alright, so they do so. Several MONTHS later, Apple approves the app.
A day later, after it becomes fairly popular? They pull the app, citing offensive content again.
Apple, stop jerking developers around. Developers make your platform what it is, and if you keep jerking them around, they’ll jump ship to Android. You’re also hurting your customers by doing this – not everyone wants you to be their moral police.
Just check the source link. That was rejected from the App Store for THAT?
Apple has removed iChatr, a Chatroulette-style app for the iPhone 4, from the App Store, due to too many people exposing themselves.
OK, that’s something to be expected on a Chatroulette-like service, but here’s the thing. You could very easily make a Chatroulette-like service that uses phone numbers, completely avoiding the app store, and then making FaceTime calls. (Granted, Chatroulette and iChatr have better privacy than that approach.)
Or, you could even have a single number for a FaceTime service that acts like Chatroulette. Call the number, hit FaceTime, get a random partner. Want to switch partners, hang up and call back. (Or, if the other person hangs up, it could autoswitch.)
And, there’s nothing stopping people from exposing themselves on FaceTime.
One thing I’ll emphasize, first, is that Apple does have every right to control content that they distribute.
However, the content in both of these graphic novels wasn’t intended to be pornographic in nature.
The publishers were willing to work with Apple, to get their novels published. In the case of Ulysses “Seen”, some panels had to be completely redrawn – even pixelation or fig leaves weren’t sufficient. As for the The Importance of Being Earnest graphic novel, one entire page had major parts of the story blacked out, involving partial nudity (but no genitalia shown) of two male characters together.
Again, Apple has the right to control content they distribute.
However, a heterosexual sex scene was preserved in an approved comic, Kick-Ass. So that doesn’t fly. (The content in Ulysses “Seen” was completely non-sexual in nature, and less was shown in The Importance of Being Earnest.)
Apple did ultimately reverse their decision, and asked both publishers to resubmit their apps, but only after the uproar about their actions. (Yes, I’m slow to post this, sue me.)
It appears that Reddit has abandoned their iPhone app.
Apparently, when Reddit has released bugfixes for approval, an approver happened to stumble upon some user-submitted content that was bad, and rejected the app. Multiple times.
So, Reddit gave up on the iPhone app, is making a new web interface, and is open sourcing the app.
This is why the approval process needs some serious work, or better yet, a way to break out of the walled garden.
Source: App Rejections